Monday, July 25, 2011
We the Future
Sunday, April 17, 2011
People power in Muskegon
This April 15th (Tax Day), the Muskegon Tea Party had their annual rally in downtown Muskegon. Last year their event had about 150 attendees and got front page coverage in the Muskegon Chronicle. This year I came out to observe what they had to say. What I saw was a few of the most devoted tea party organizers, and not much else. Altogether they had maybe 30 people present. It made me ask: What if you threw a tea party and no one came?
It is our responsibility as progressives not to hold up those we disagree with as bogeymen, but to bring our message to them. That may mean you get yelled at sometimes (as I was). But I also had several civil conversations and was able to explain some issues to people in a way they hadn’t heard before. Did I change any minds? I don't know. But I do know the public is trending our way. People are realizing we are all in this together, and when there are those who would divide us by race, religion, gender, union vs. non-union, public employees vs. private, or anything else, then those people are best ignored. We are one, and we will rise or fall together.
The next rally is Thursday, April 28th at 3:30pm, at the CIO Hall, 490 W. Western Ave. We will march at 4:00pm sharp from there to Hackley Park. This is not a "Democrat" event. This is not a "union" event. This is for anyone who is concerned about our eroding standard of living and anyone who believes in the ideal of a citizen-controlled government. Hope to see you there!
Sean Mullally
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
'We Are One' rallies growing in Muskegon.
The event was similar to but somewhat larger than one held here two weeks ago. The next one should be even larger yet! There were several more speakers than I included here. The whole march and rally lasted nearly two hours, but a lot of my footage couldn't be used do bad audio and wind noise. I am getting more video that was taken with a different camera, so I might have some coverage of more speakers coming up later. This is just a small snippet.
Thanks to all the people who came out, organized, and spoke at yesterday's rally.
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Would your legislator work for a teacher's pay?
Sara Scholtens wrote an interesting proposal in Saturday's Kalamazoo Gazette. Many of our Michigan legislators have been fixating recently on how much our public employees are paid, claiming it's too much. Scholtens suggests that if our school teachers' pay is so generous, perhaps our legislators would like to work for the same salary. This is similar to the proposal I advocated last year that our legislator's salary should be set equal to the median income in the state.Currently our state representatives are paid $82,485 per year in salary and expense allowance. This is the second highest in the nation, behind only California. Scholtens claims a typical salary for a teacher in Michigan is about $38,000. She continues to say if we were to reduce our legislators compensation to that of a entry level teacher, it would save taxpayers nearly $5 million per year.
Shared sacrifice requires leading be example. I would call upon our legislators to do the right thing and accept the same pay cuts they are calling on others to take. This is potentially a win-win proposition. Taxpayers would save millions, and legislators could gain credibility by walking the walk. As a additional benefit, going forward we might get more people in office for the right reasons rather than those just chasing the $82,485 paycheck. That could only serve to help the political climate in Lansing.
But watch carefully. Any measure to reduce compensation for legislators must include current office holders. One of the slight-of-hand tricks that have been used in the past is for lawmakers to pass pay and benefit cuts that affect only their successors and then boast endlessly about it as an act of political courage.
Call you representative or senator today and ask them if they are willing to accept the pay of a teacher!
Upcoming events
But we've also seen the American people invigorated and fighting back! From Madison, Wisconsin to Lansing, Michigan and even right here in Muskegon we've seen people take to the streets in record numbers and say in one unified voice, "Enough!" I've recorded some of these events for those who couldn't be there and included links here.
This movement is continuing and growing. Below is information on two important upcoming events in Muskegon where your voice can be heard. Your voice in your workplace, in your school district, and your local government are under attack by the current leadership in Lansing. This is a use it or lose it moment. We need to get out and be heard while we still can!
Rep. Marcia Hovey-Wright and Mitchell Bean, nonpartisan House Fiscal Agency Director are hosting a Town Hall meeting about Michigan's Budget. Monday, March 28, 7:00 p.m. at the Stevenson Center at MCC, room 1100. Bean is an expert on Michigan's budget. This is information we all need to know. Come hear Representative Hovey-Wright's and Director Bean's analysis of events in Lansing and ask some questions!
'We Are One' RallyApril 4th, Muskegon will be rallying to commemorate the day Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King was assassinated for fighting for human rights. We again are in a struggle with our government and Big Business for some of these same rights, so we rally on this day to get our message out and be heard!
State Sen. Geoff Hansen, State Reps. Holly Hughes and Marsha Hovey-Wright have been invited to attend and address our group. We must keep the message out that we won't be silenced and recalls will follow if we aren't represented by our elected leaders. Come down to Heritage Lansing from 4pm - 6pm on Monday Apr. 4th, and let your voice be heard!
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Is nuclear worth it?
The recent earthquake and tsunami in Japan were bad enough, but the subsequent failure of multiple nuclear reactors at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi facility quickly grabbed the headlines. The public has always had a simmering distrust of nuclear power. Nuclear proponents will say this is due to a lack of knowledge. We fear what we don’t understand. But the truth is more complex than that. Nuclear accidents don’t cause as many immediate casualties as natural disasters, but their insidious poisoning can spread far and last virtually forever.Yes, nuclear is one answer to the climate change crisis. It is said that nuclear energy emits no carbon dioxide. Of course, if we count the process of mining and refining the uranium fuel, an energy intensive process, we’re forced to admit that nuclear energy does involve some carbon emissions after all.
Nuclear is also phenomenally expensive. Nuclear power was originally promoted as too cheap to meter, but has turned out to be far and away the most expensive source of electricity, even with massive government subsidies. One new nuclear plant is anticipated to cost $10 billion to build.
Most of this cost is due to elaborate safety requirements, but as we see in Japan this can only reduce the risk of disaster, not eliminate it. We have to begin with the understanding that no mechanism built by man is or will ever be 100% reliable. Every system will fail at some point. We have to accept that going in.
In the late nineties, I worked for a short time at Detroit Edison’s Fermi 2 nuclear facility south of Detroit. It’s called Fermi 2 for a reason. Sitting immediately next to the facility is the decommissioned Fermi 1 reactor which suffered a core meltdown in 1966. The incident is covered in detail in John Fuller’s book, We Almost Lost Detroit.
In an inspection in 2006, it was discovered that Fermi 2’s backup diesel generators were nonfunctional and would not have worked if called upon in an emergency. It’s difficult to overstate the importance of these generators. They are critical to prevent a catastrophic meltdown if primary power is lost. Furthermore, the inspection revealed the generators had been nonfunctional since 1986. For 20 years the plant was operating a high wire act with no safety net. Michigan is amazingly lucky the Fermi 2 site had no major power disruptions during those decades. It’s also worth noting that the Fermi 2 reactor is the exact same GE Mark I design as Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi reactors that have proven so fragile.
With Fermi 1, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and now Fukushima Daiichi, we’ve seen that accidents happen regardless of precautions. Accidents will always happen. The question we need to ask ourselves is: Is nuclear worth the cost? Are there better alternatives? One way or another, we’re going to use energy. Perhaps looking at some windmills on the horizon isn’t so bad, considering the alternatives.